Content: S18-71.rar (27.71 KB)
Uploaded: 23.10.2018

Positive responses: 0
Negative responses: 0

Sold: 0
Refunds: 0

$2
CONTENT

Introduction 3
1. The concept and classification of fraud 6
1.1. General provisions on the classification of fraud 6
1.2. Types of fraud 9
2. Problems of qualification of fraud 12
2.1. Qualification of fraud committed within a transaction 12
2.2. Qualification of fraud committed outside the transaction 16
3. New types of fraud under the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation 21
Conclusion 31
References used 34

LIST OF USED SOURCES

I. Regulatory and other official documents

1. Civil Code of the Russian Federation (Part One) of November 30, 1994 No. 51-ФЗ (as amended on July 3, 2016 No. 354-ФЗ) // Collected Legislation of the Russian Federation. 1994. № 32. Art. 3301.
2. Criminal Code of the Russian Federation of June 13, 1996 No. 63-FZ (as amended on July 6, 2016 No. 375-ФЗ) // Collected Legislation of the Russian Federation. 1996. № 25. Art. 2954.
3. Federal Law of the Russian Federation of November 29, 2012 No. 207-FZ “On Amending the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation and Certain Legislative Acts of the Russian Federation” // Collected Legislation of the Russian Federation. 2012. № 49. Art. 6752.

Ii. Materials of judicial practice

4. Determination of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation of July 2, 2009 No. 1037-OO “On the refusal to accept the complaint of citizen Khodorkovsky Mikhail Borisovich for violation of his constitutional rights by article 160 and note 1 to article 158 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation” resource]: URL: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_92650/. (the date of appeal: 11/19/2016).
5. Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation of December 27, 2007 No. 51 “On judicial practice in cases of fraud, embezzlement and embezzlement” // Russian newspaper. 2008. January 12th. No. 4561.
6. The verdict of the Dorogomilovsky District Court of Moscow dated June 18, 2010 [Electronic resource]: ATP "Garant" (appeal date 11/21/2016).
7. The sentence of the Magadan City Court of May 11, 2010 in case No. 1-344 / 10 [Electronic resource]: ATP "Garant" (appeal date: 11/20/2016).
8. The sentence of the Magadan City Court of June 10, 2010 in case No. 1-423 / 10 [Electronic resource]: ATP "Garant" (appeal date: 11/22/2016).
9. The verdict of the Sosnovy Bor City Court of the Leningrad Region of February 1, 2010 in case No. 1-17 [Electronic resource]. ATP "Garant" (appeal date: 11/20/2016).
10. The verdict of the magistrate of 10 judicial district Vidnovsky judicial district of the Moscow region of April 17, 2003 [Electronic resource]: ATP "Garant" (appeal date: 11/20/2016).

III. Special literature

11. Andreev S.V. The value of fraud in the qualification of employment fraud / S.V. Andreev. // Legal science and practice. 2012. № 19. S. 103 - 105.
12. Krasikova A.A. Abuse of trust as a means of committing fraud / A.A. Krasikova. // Law and Law. 2012. № 8. P. 80 - 82.
13. Krasikova A. A. On the issue of recognizing fraud as a form of theft / A.A. Krasikova. // Russian legal journal. 2012. № 3. S. 158 - 164.
14. Larichev V.D., Ilin I.V. Issues of improving the criminal legislation on fraud / V.D. Larichev, I.V. Ilyin. // Bulletin of the Academy of Economic Security of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2011. № 3. P. 77 - 83.
15. Shelenkov S.N. On the issue of the practice of criminal punishment for fraud / N.K. Shelenkov. // Law and Economics. 2010. No. 10. P. 44 - 52.
Remember that any ready-made work needs to be finalized and can not be used as an end-product. The work was done in WORD format in accordance with GOST.
No feedback yet